TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2011
Contributed by: Dennis Fortier, President, Medical Care Corporation
Surely, you’ve all read the grim reports about Alzheimer’s disease. The advancing age of the US population will usher forth an Alzheimer’s epidemic in the coming decade. The emotional toll of this epidemic will be immeasurable, and the financial impact could bankrupt the Medicare system.
That
dire version of the story might sell newspapers, but it doesn’t really reflect
the available options to a nation with a will to fight back. The good news is: we can manage this problem. And no elusive scientific discoveries
are required to do so. We merely need to implement the medical knowledge
that is already in hand.
To be
clear, scientific advances yielding better treatments and more accurate
diagnostic approaches will greatly improve our prospects in this battle.
We need to aggressively fund research and push forward on that front. However,
it is important to recognize the sizeable gap between the high standard of
care that is achievable based on the current state of medical knowledge, and
the lagging standard of care that is routinely implemented in a primary care
clinic.
Pragmatism: Closing the Gap
Closing
the gap in the Alzheimer’s field could yield tremendous benefits. It will
take some effort, but we can achieve such a goal through pure effort and public
will. Compared to solutions based on the hope of new scientific
discoveries, this has the appeal of greater certainty.
To
close the clinical gap, we must address three key areas where “common
practices” are significantly lagging behind “best practices”.
1)
Education: We need to promote public education and awareness about
the many, common medical conditions that impair memory (depression, anxiety,
sleep disorders, thyroid malfunction, vitamin deficiency, medications,
etc). This will reduce stigma associated with memory loss and encourage
patients to be more proactive in expressing early concerns to their physicians.
2)
Proven Clinical Standards: We need to help primary care physicians adopt proven
standards for differentiating between signs of normal aging and subtle symptoms
caused by medical conditions that impair memory. Out-dated assessments for
identifying dementia are aiming too late in the process; we need to facilitate
effective intervention at an earlier, subtler stage of impairment. Newer
clinical assessment tools can ensure that emerging problems are addressed in a
timely manner, prior to unnecessary disease progression and declining health.
3)
Effective Treatment: We need to ensure that patients,
physicians, and caregivers can recognize what effective treatment looks like;
doing so will aid ongoing compliance with a prescribed regimen of care.
Compared to treatments for other causes of memory loss, expectations for
treating Alzheimer’s disease are often unrealistic. For AD, effective
treatment is not a complete reversal of symptoms, but rather, a slowing of
functional decline. Importantly, everyone must appreciate that proper
treatment for AD involves more than just drugs; it also encompasses proper
diet, regular physical exercise, and tight control of other chronic
conditions.
Concrete
steps in these three areas will narrow the gap between “current practices” and
“best practices”. Doing so will mitigate the impact from two of the most destructive
components of the Alzheimer’s disease problem: under-diagnosis and
under-treatment.
Under-Diagnosis
According
to the World Alzheimer’s Report 2011, published by
Alzheimer’s Disease International, there may be 36 million demented people in
the world and 28 million of them are undiagnosed. That is, no doctor has diagnosed the underlying cause of
the dementia and prescribed treatment to resolve the problem. According
to well-accepted prevalence data, a large percentage of these people are
demented due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). For all of those people, their
disease is progressing unabated, their symptoms are progressing, and the
ongoing costs of their care are moving irreversibly upward.
Under-Treatment
As of today, AD cannot be cured, but a timely
intervention including careful management of diabetes and hypertension, a
proper diet, physical activity, and poly-therapy with approved Alzheimer’s
drugs, can significantly slow progression for a meaningful percentage of those
28 million people who have been neither diagnosed nor treated. Additionally,
many other conditions that cause memory loss are both common and completely
treatable. If no diagnostic work-up is performed, these conditions go
untreated at the ongoing peril of the patient’s health, which ultimately drives
the cost of care higher.
Certainly, a better-educated public, timelier
diagnosis of medical conditions that impair memory, and robust treatment are
all central facets of a solution to the Alzheimer’s epidemic. Each has
deep economic implications underscoring the importance of addressing them. As
shown by examples like the Orange County Vital Aging Program*, all of
these can be achieved through pragmatic, community-based efforts to improve
knowledge and raise standards of care among primary care physicians.
Overall, the looming threat of an Alzheimer’s
epidemic is a real problem that may well have painful consequences. We would all like more certainty
that scientific efforts will soon thwart the disease, but we cannot yet count
on that with high confidence. In the meantime, a concerted effort to
pragmatically implement the scientific advances from the past decade of
research will significantly reduce its likely impact.

0 comments:
Post a Comment