Alzheimer's Reading Room
March, 2011
Buried in the comments to Bob’ s article, In the Bunkhouse, Random Thoughts Edition, and in reference to the growing number of Alzheimer's caregivers (almost 15 million), I noticed this exchange:
Reading the above exchange made me wonder about those invisible siblings and adult children.
How can they blithely carry on without realizing how important and meaningful a small act in support of the caring mission would be? Then, I began to identify all of the assumptions I made when I formulated the question.
I assumed that they are untroubled by their abdication of support responsibilities. I assumed that they know what to do in support. I assumed that they are capable of empathy, for their afflicted parent as well as for their burdened sibling.
Is it reasonable to assume any of this?
Why should it matter whether the invisible sibling is troubled by their inaction? Perhaps because we want to believe that eventually their consciences will prod them to action. Perhaps we cling to this hope despite months and years of evidence to the contrary simply because hope is part of the gravitational force that pulls us forward and through every day.
Maybe they don’t know what to do after all.
The last thing the caregiver needs is another task -- that of educating the absent ones on how to help. No primary caregiver can manufacture compassion and empathy in a person unfamiliar with these states of mind and heart. That Herculean task need not be added to our abundant responsibilities.
Everything we choose signifies something about us. We who have chosen to be the One need only consider the invisible ones to realize that another choice existed,and it’s a choice we rejected.
Spending our emotional capital lamenting the incomprehensible choice made by those who have turned a blind eye or hardened their hearts will only deplete us. We can’t afford that.
When I’m troubled by matters like these, I look for a way to frame an invisible sibling’s behavior that explains it. I’m just looking for some sort of rational context so that I can steel myself against future disappointments.
What can feel punitive usually isn’t intended in that way. Contextualizing it lets me put this burden aside for a while, if I’ m lucky.
If you’re burdened by a family member who is missing-in-action, what do you do?
How do you keep those feelings from intruding in the positive and caring environment you work so hard at maintaining?
March, 2011
 |
| Are Alzheimer's Caregivers the Forgotten? |
Carole: "What I'd really like stats on, are those who have a close relative with Alzheimer's ... and they refuse to help. I want a stat on the deadbeats so they can see themselves officially identified. Right now they are invisible".Many of us who are the One have experienced intense disappointment, hurt, and anger when we feel like we've been abandoned to our mission by those with an equal stake in our loved one’ s care.
Nancy: “ Hear, Hear!!! I totally agree!! If everyone who identified themselves as a primary caregiver also indicated how many siblings they have who do not help … well, my conservative estimate is another 15 million!!!”
Reading the above exchange made me wonder about those invisible siblings and adult children.
How can they blithely carry on without realizing how important and meaningful a small act in support of the caring mission would be? Then, I began to identify all of the assumptions I made when I formulated the question.
I assumed that they are untroubled by their abdication of support responsibilities. I assumed that they know what to do in support. I assumed that they are capable of empathy, for their afflicted parent as well as for their burdened sibling.
Is it reasonable to assume any of this?
Why should it matter whether the invisible sibling is troubled by their inaction? Perhaps because we want to believe that eventually their consciences will prod them to action. Perhaps we cling to this hope despite months and years of evidence to the contrary simply because hope is part of the gravitational force that pulls us forward and through every day.
Maybe they don’t know what to do after all.
The last thing the caregiver needs is another task -- that of educating the absent ones on how to help. No primary caregiver can manufacture compassion and empathy in a person unfamiliar with these states of mind and heart. That Herculean task need not be added to our abundant responsibilities.
Everything we choose signifies something about us. We who have chosen to be the One need only consider the invisible ones to realize that another choice existed,and it’s a choice we rejected.
Spending our emotional capital lamenting the incomprehensible choice made by those who have turned a blind eye or hardened their hearts will only deplete us. We can’t afford that.
When I’m troubled by matters like these, I look for a way to frame an invisible sibling’s behavior that explains it. I’m just looking for some sort of rational context so that I can steel myself against future disappointments.
What can feel punitive usually isn’t intended in that way. Contextualizing it lets me put this burden aside for a while, if I’ m lucky.
If you’re burdened by a family member who is missing-in-action, what do you do?
How do you keep those feelings from intruding in the positive and caring environment you work so hard at maintaining?
0 comments:
Post a Comment